CHILD RAPE IS KIDNAPPING ( re written for clarification)
CHILD RAPE IS KIDNAPPING
This is the Key to unlock immediate prosecutions of victims in all states and at the Federal government where there is no statute of limitations for the kidnapping:
U.S. v. Gabaldon, 389 F.3d 1090 (10th Cir. 2004)
“Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person ... when
...
(2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; “…
“Our cases have interpreted this statute to require, inter alia, that the victim be (1) held against his or her will (2) for some benefit to the captor. See Walker, 137 F.3d at 1220”
1: “held against his or her will”: No child can consent to being taken from the spot they occupy at the Moment of contact with the Abuser. Children do not have the ability to distinguish the legal concept of Abduction. They cannot consent to Anything under the law involved in these acts.
There is ZERO difference between a grimy old man offering a child a lollipop to walk with them or a child being offered an “acting” or “Modeling” gig by a wealthy Abuser in a Rolls Royce. Both offers are a form of Inveiglement. Whatever lure used to bring the child into “possession” of the Abuser is no different than invisible handcuffs working on the vulnerability of the child’s brain. They have been captured at the acceptance of the offer. A Bond has been formed. Their will suborned. They do not recognize their captivity.
Moreover the statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1201, has what may seem an unnecessary repeating of the term: kidnaps : “ inveigles, decoys, kidnaps...”. I read this as there is a special meaning at the second use of “Kidnaps” as a subset of the term kidnapping. “ Kidnaps” is an action verb like the rest of that subset. A quick scan of the Laws shows it has its basis in old English law where Kidnapping literally meant Child Theft… and I read this as it has the Meaning of “ Child theft” in the context it is being used.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/kidnap
kidnap(v.)
1680s, thieves’ cant, a compound of kid (n.) “child” and nap (v.) “snatch away,” which probably is a variant of nab (v.). Perhaps a back-formation from kidnapper, which is recorded earlier. Originally “to steal children to provide servants and laborers in the American colonies.”
Now to Clarify: I read the statute to mean as soon as the Abuser has taken “ control” of the child; that is Child Theft... AKA... Kidnap; It needs no extended time frame.. just as when you steal from a bank… you committed the crime without even leaving the premises once you have the bank’s money in your possession. A child cannot consent to a sex act.. their bodies held in a form of bondage. They, by Definition, are being held against their will: “KIDNAPPED”.
(2) “for some benefit to the captor.”: Having a child sex toy is the greatest reward you can give to any Abuser: Power over a much weaker person.
We have met the requirements under law: Now: How to apply the LAW immediately: Federally: 18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony: “ Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both”
United States v. Olson: Here is a good write up on the Nature of the Law: Suffice it to say, there are no Limits on the types of Felonies that can be reported or Whom can or cannot report the crime. https://kellogghansen.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/9th-Circ.-Raises-The-Bar-On-Misprision-Of-A-Felony.pdf
Now while this statute deals with the Crime of not reporting a felony, it also lays out a basis for the prosecution of crimes a person has direct knowledge of by reporting it to the appropriate authorities. Now this is where it gets interesting.
Scenario # 1: Say you are a US Congressperson like Ted Lieu and you are in a committee hearing and you witness a felony: 18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees. The Witness under oath Lies directly to you and your committee. “There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.” The witness just told a lie under oath . You know this Lie is the cover-up of other crimes. You have seen unredacted parts of Epstein files and have read the reports and seen the Pictures and video of clear child rape. But Now you realize that based upon this analysis you have also seen kidnapping. You have not only seen the crime; you know the information about Kidnapping and rape are being shielded by the direct actions of The Top of the DOJ… they are failing to act on the Crimes, they are also committing Accessory for after the fact by breaking the law and refusing to release the records documenting these crimes effectively preventing their prosecution; You see this as clearly also as Aiding and Abetting the Rapists and Kidnappers. You cannot report this to the DOJ because they are active participants in the crimes you need to report: You are authorized under Misprision of a Felony to report the crimes. Given the special circumstances you petition a Judge to take control of the evidence of the crimes before it is destroyed. You request a Special Council by the Judge as the DOJ is corrupted and given the exigent circumstances; it is clear the Judge must act under Misprision as clearly as you are required to report, they are Required to act. In your petition you explain the denial of the ability to prosecute the crimes involved was in fact a miscarriage of justice and also obstruction. The Conclusion; your argument is making sure this investigation will be forced to pursue all crimes discovered, starting with the most serious. And that any action must prevent interference by the DOJ in the Remit of the Special prosecutor. You as a Congress person ask for charges against Pam Bondi for Obstruction of congressional Investigation, Aiding and abetting the rape and kidnapping of children and Accessory after the fact.. . You Request Kidnapping charges of any recognizable men with children in the Files… those children didn’t get there by accident.. It was an organized crime. Asking for the Judge to ensure every Abuser of a child is tracked down and charged.
Scenario for the Victims: I would suggest they find a group or reputable lawyers.. and their group and Lawyers go in make the same claims against Bondi, Maxwell for Kidnapping; in the state that they were kidnapped and raped. And that you want federal kidnapping charged ( no Statute of limitations in this). You request the conditions that The Special Prosecutor be independent from the DOJ/FBI because they have blocked the information needed under the Law and are clearly acting on behalf of the Epstein clientele and not the victims. That Every crime must be allowed to be charged. If your state has no Statute of Limitations, that is likely an easier route.
For the Lady who was 13 when raped... I checked : there is no Statute of limitation in South Carolina: With this Knowledge she may well come forward and press charges on Trump.. and any other person involved. “Kidnapping: In South Carolina, there is no statute of limitations for offenses related to kidnapping.” David W. Martin Law Group
I am Not an attorney. I am an Old Information Analyst. I was mentally, physically and sexually abused from infancy. I seek justice for the victims.
PS: This may well work for Many child victims, Like those kids who were lured to Ohio State so please pass it on to any victims that could benefit from this.
Please let me know this was at least read. Thank you